Value co-creation between coworking spaces and startups in different stages of development




Coworking Space, Startup, Sharing economy, Co-creation, Digital transformation


Purpose – This study identified, characterized, and evaluated the relevance of the services provided by Coworking spaces considering the different stages in the evolution of a startup.

Design/methodology/approach – A narrative literature review was conducted and the second phase of the research included the development of netnographic initiatives and the conduction of multiple case studies.

Findings – As a result, six categories of services were identified, comprehending 36 services, whose relevance varies considering the maturity level of the startup.

Originality/value – This research contributes to the literature by providing a systemic view of the state of practice of these services in the context of Coworking spaces.

Keywords - Coworking Space. Startup. Sharing economy. Co-creation. Digital transformation.


Archpru Akaka, M., Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2012). An Exploration of Networks in Value Cocreation: A Service-Ecosystems View. Review of Marketing Research, 13–50. DOI:

Appel-Meulenbroek, R., van de Kar, M., van den Berg, P., & Arentze, T. (2019). Employees’ preferences for services and facilities offered in serviced offices. Facilities, 37(1/2), 3–20. DOI:

Appel-Meulenbroek, R., Weijs-Perrée, M., Orel, M., Gauger, F., & Pfnür, A. (2020). User preferences for coworking spaces; a comparison between the Netherlands, Germany and the Czech Republic. Review of Managerial Science. DOI:

Asamoah, D., Nuertey, D., Agyei-Owusu, B., & Akyeh, J. (2021). The effect of supply chain responsiveness on customer development. The International Journal of Logistics Management, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). DOI:

Barratt, M. J., & Maddox, A. (2016). Active engagement with stigmatised communities through digital ethnography. Qualitative Research, 16(6), 701–719. DOI:

Belz, F.-M., & Baumbach, W. (2010). Netnography as a Method of Lead User Identification. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(3), 304–313. DOI:

Berbegal-Mirabent, J. (2021). What Do We Know about Co-Working Spaces? Trends and Challenges Ahead. Sustainability, 13(3), 1416. DOI:

Bouncken, R. B. (2018). University coworking-spaces: mechanisms, examples, and suggestions for entrepreneurial universities. International Journal of Technology Management, 77(1/2/3), 38. DOI:

Bouncken, R. B., Laudien, S. M., Fredrich, V., & Görmar, L. (2017). Coopetition in coworking-spaces: value creation and appropriation tensions in an entrepreneurial space. Review of Managerial Science, 12(2), 385–410. DOI:

Bouncken, R., Ratzmann, M., Barwinski, R., & Kraus, S. (2020). Coworking spaces: Empowerment for entrepreneurship and innovation in the digital and sharing economy. Journal of Business Research, 114, 102–110. DOI:

Bouncken, R. B., Aslam, M. M., & Qiu, Y. (2020). Coworking spaces: Understanding, using, and managing sociomateriality. Business Horizons, 64(1). DOI:

Bueno, S., Rodríguez-Baltanás, G., & Gallego, M. D. (2018). Coworking spaces: a new way of achieving productivity. Journal of Facilities Management, 16(4), 452–466. DOI:

Cabral, V., & van Winden, W. (2022). The reaction of coworking spaces to the COVID-19 pandemic. A dynamic capabilities perspective. Service Business. DOI:

Capdevila, I. (2015) Co-working spaces and the localised dynamics of innovation in Barcelona. International Journal of Innovation Management, v. 19, n. 3. DOI:

Capdevila, I. (2019). Joining a collaborative space: is it really a better place to work? Journal of Business Strategy, 40(2), 14–21. DOI:

Chandler, J. D., & Vargo, S. L. (2011). Contextualization and value-in-context: How context frames exchange. Marketing Theory, 11(1), 35–49. DOI:

Chengbin, W., Hongbin, W., Min, D., & Yongyan, F. (2022). Lean Startup Approaches(LSAs): Convergence, Integration and Improvement. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 179, 121640. DOI:

Di Marino, M., & Lapintie, K. (2017). Emerging Workplaces in Post-Functionalist Cities. Journal of Urban Technology, 24(3), 5–25. DOI:

Di Marino, M., Lilius, J., & Lapintie, K. (2018). New forms of multi-local working: identifying multi-locality in planning as well as public and private organizations’ strategies in the Helsinki region. European Planning Studies, 26(10), 2015–2035. DOI:

Eckhardt, G. M., Houston, M. B., Jiang, B., Lamberton, C., Rindfleisch, A., & Zervas, G. (2019). Marketing in the Sharing Economy. Journal of Marketing, 83(5), 5–27. DOI:

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. DOI:

Fiorentino, S. (2019). Different typologies of “co-working spaces” and the contemporary dynamics of local economic development in Rome. European Planning Studies, 27(9), 1768–1790. DOI:

André Leme Fleury, Sara Miriam Goldchmit, Maria Alice Gonzales, de, R., & Tiago Lazzaretti Fernandes. (2022). Innovation in Orthopedics: Part 1—Design Thinking. Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 15(2), 143–149. DOI:

Fraiberg, S. (2017). Start-Up Nation. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 31(3), 350–388. DOI:

Gandini, A., & Cossu, A. (2019). The third wave of coworking: “Neo-corporate” model versus “resilient” practice. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 136754941988606. DOI:

Gauger, F., Pfnür, A., & Strych, J.-O. (2021). Coworking spaces and Start-ups: Empirical evidence from a product market competition and life cycle perspective. Journal of Business Research, 132, 67–78. DOI:

Goermar, L., Barwinski, R. W., Bouncken, R. B., & Laudien, S. M. (2020). Co-creation in coworking-spaces: boundary conditions of diversity. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 1–12. DOI:

Guo, Y.-M., Huang, Z.-L., Guo, J., Li, H., Guo, X.-R., & Nkeli, M. J. (2019). Bibliometric Analysis on Smart Cities Research. Sustainability, 11(13), 3606. DOI:

Howell, T. (2022). Coworking spaces: An overview and research agenda. Research Policy, 51(2), 104447. DOI:

Kojo, I., & Nenonen, S. (2016). Typologies for co-working spaces in Finland – what and how? Facilities, 34(5/6), 302–313. DOI:

Kozinets, R. (1998) On Netnography: Initial Reflections on Consumer Research Investigations of Cyberculture. Advances in Consumer Research. v. 25, p. 366-37.

Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, A., & Isaac, H. (2016). The new office: how coworking changes the work concept. Journal of Business Strategy, 37(6), 3–9. DOI:

Mayerhoffer, M. (2021). The impact of Covid-19 on coworking spaces: evidence from Germany. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). DOI:

Pittaway, L., Aissaoui, R., Ferrier, M., & Mass, P. (2019). University spaces for entrepreneurship: a process model. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research. DOI:

Rese, A., Görmar, L., & Herbig, A. (2021). Social networks in coworking spaces and individual coworker’s creativity. Review of Managerial Science. DOI:

Richardson, L. (2017). Sharing as a postwork style: digital work and the co-working office. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 10(2), 297–310. DOI:

Ries, E. (2011) The Lean Startup. Crown Business.

Sankari, I., Peltokorpi, A., & Nenonen, S. (2018). A call for co-working – users’ expectations regarding learning spaces in higher education. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 20(2), 117–137. DOI:

Schmidt, S. (2019). In the making: Open Creative Labs as an emerging topic in economic geography? Geography Compass, 13(9). DOI:

Seo, J., Lysiankova, L., Ock, Y.-S., & Chun, D. (2017). Priorities of Coworking Space Operation Based on Comparison of the Hosts and Users’ Perspectives. Sustainability, 9(8), 1494. DOI:

Spinuzzi, C. (2012). Working Alone Together. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26(4), 399–441. DOI:

Spinuzzi, C., Bodrožić, Z., Scaratti, G., & Ivaldi, S. (2019). “Coworking Is About Community”: But What Is “Community” in Coworking? Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 33(2), 112–140. DOI:

Štefko, R., & Steffek, V. (2017). A STUDY OF CREATIVE INDUSTRY ENTREPRENEURIAL INCUBATION. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 15(2), 250–261. DOI:

Vargo, S. L., & Akaka, M. A. (2012). Value Cocreation and Service Systems (Re)Formation: A Service Ecosystems View. Service Science, 4(3), 207–217. DOI:

Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2012). The Nature and Understanding of Value: A Service-Dominant Logic Perspective. Review of Marketing Research, 1–12. DOI:

Vargo, S. L., Akaka, M. A., & Vaughan, C. M. (2017). Conceptualizing Value: A Service-ecosystem View. Journal of Creating Value, 3(2), 117–124. DOI:

Waters-Lynch, J., & Duff, C. (2019). The affective commons of Coworking. Human Relations, 001872671989463. DOI:

Weijs-Perrée, M., van de Koevering, J., Appel-Meulenbroek, R., & Arentze, T. (2018). Analysing user preferences for co-working space characteristics. Building Research & Information, 47(5), 534–548. DOI:

Wu, M.-Y., & Pearce, P. L. (2013). Appraising netnography: towards insights about new markets in the digital tourist era. Current Issues in Tourism, 17(5), 463–474. DOI:

Yin, R. K. (2014) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage Publications, 2014




Como Citar

Barajas, G., & Fleury, A. L. (2024). Value co-creation between coworking spaces and startups in different stages of development. Revista Gestão Da Produção Operações E Sistemas, 18(00).




Artigos mais lidos pelo mesmo(s) autor(es)