Worker knowledge sharing in logistics services: case of a Brazilian aircraft manufacturer
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15675/gepros.v17i3.2786Keywords:
Resiliência, Compartilhamento de Conhecimento, Logística, Fabricante de AeronavesAbstract
Purpose - This paper assesses factors that enable tacit knowledge sharing among logistic workers at Brazilian aircraft manufacturer.
Design/methodology/approach - The proposal methodology is supported by a mixed methods approach to examine how organizations can develop favorable contexts to explore knowledge sharing relations among workers in the Logistics area of a Brazilian aircraft manufacturer. The proposal has a qualitative phase based on local interviews, informal conversations and on-site observations. The quantitative phase entails a ranking of the different factors that support knowledge sharing in terms of their relative importance to each other, using the Analytic Hierarchy Process with Incomplete Pairwise Comparison (AHP-IPC).
Findings - Our overall results indicated that Understanding of Work Instruction and Registration in Work Instruction were perceived as the most important processes among the logistic workers, followed by Conversation among Workers. Based on the qualitative phase analysis it was possible to observe that the factors Incentive, Work Instruction, Zero Defect and Training were considered relevant.
Research limitations/implications - This study was limited to the logistics department of a Brazilian aircraft manufacturer and its logistic workers.
Practical implications - The findings contribute to support managers to deal knowledge sharing through efficient communication, collaboration and thrust among workers in the company.
Originality/value - This is the first study in a Logistics department of a Brazilian aircraft manufacturer applying the proposal methodology based on questionnaires in order to capture the workers perception of the resilience and knowledge sharing in the shop floor and it is very relevant due the complexity of the operation in a logistic area of an aircraft manufacturer.
Keywords: Knowledge Sharing, Logistic, Aircraft Manufacturer, Brazil.
References
Abbariki, M.; Snell, R.S.; Easterby-Smith, M. “Sharing or ignoring tacit knowledge? A comparison of collective learning routines at two sites.”Journal of General Management2017, Vol. 42(4) 57–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306307017702997
Adini , B., Cohen , O., Eide , A.W., Nilsson,S.,. Aharonson-Daniel, L.,Herrera,I.A. Striving to be resilient:What concepts, approaches and practices should be incorporated in resilience management guidelines? Technological Forecasting & Social Change 121 (2017) 39–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.01.020
Annarelli , A., Nonino, F.Strategic and operational management of organizational resilience: Current state of research and future directions Omega 62(2016)1–18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2015.08.004
Ali Asghar. Fani Hasan. DanaeeFard.Knowledge Management and Organizational Resilience in Iranian Public Organizations.Information and Knowledge Management www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-5758 (Paper) ISSN 2224-896X (Online) Vol.5, No.7, 2015
Ansari.M.A.,Jantan,MJayasingam.S."Influencing knowledge workers: thepower of top management", Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 110 Iss 1 pp. 134 – 151, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02635571011008443
Batista , E.D.J., Muniz, J. and Nakano, D. “Engaging environments: tacit knowledge sharing on the shop floor”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 17 NO. 2 2013, pp. 290-306, 2013.
Bornia, A. C.; Wernke, R. A contabilidade gerencial e os métodos multicriteriais. RevistaContabilidade&Finanças. FIPECAPI – FEA – USP. v.14, n. 25, p. 60- 71, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-70772001000100004
Bozóki, S.; fülöp,J.; Rónyai, L. Incomplete Pairwise Comparison Matrices in Multi-Attribute Decision Making, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), Hong Kong, p. 8-11, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2009.5373064
Brunsdon, D., McManus, S., Seville, E, Vargo, J.ResilienceManagementA Framework for Assessing and Improving the Resilience of Organisations.ResilientOrganisations. Research Report 2007/01.
Cheng, Y., Liangsiri, J., Madsen, E.S.Transferringknowledgein the relocation of manufacturing units. Strategic Outsourcing: AnInternationalJournalVol. 3 No. 1, 2010pp. 5-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/17538291011023043
Cheong, K.F.; Tsui, E. “From Skills and Competencies to Outcome-based Collaborative Work: Tracking a Decade's Development of Personal Knowledge Management (PKM) Models.”
Cleveland.S.,Ellis, T.J.Rethinking Knowledge Sharing Barriers: A Content Analysis of 103 Studies.International Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(1), 28-51, January-March 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/IJKM.2015010102
Costanzo, L.A., Vicky , T. "Enhancing organisational learning in teams: has the middle manager got a role?" Team Performance Management: An International Journal , Vol. 14 Issue: 3/4, pp.146-164, https://doi.org/10.1108/13527590810883424, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13527590810883424
Dahlan, H.M., Iahad, N.A., Ibrahim, O, Nilashi,M ., Rad, M.S. “Assessing the Evaluation Factors In Measuring Knowledge Sharing Performance”.Journal of Multidisciplinary Engineering Science and Technology (JMEST), ISSN: 3159-0040 , Vol. 1 Issue 5, December - 2014.
Dalziell, E.P., S.T.McManus. Resilience, Vulnerability, and Adaptive Capacity: Implications for System Performance. International Forum for Engineering Decision Making (IFED):Stoos. Switzwerland December 6-8, 2004.
Denyer, D., Smart, P., Tranfield, D. Towards a Methodology for DevelopingEvidence-Knowledge by Means of SystematicReview. British Journal of Management, Vol. 14, 207–222 (2003). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
Ertay, T., Ruan ,D., Tuzkaya, U,R. Integrating data envelopment analysis andanalytic hierarchy for the facility layout design in manufacturing systems InformationSciences 176 (2006) 237–262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2004.12.001
Fard, S.M.H., Seyedyousefi, N., Tohidi, F. "The role of organizational culture in the knowledge management process", Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 19 Issue: 3, pp.433-455, 2015.
Foss, N.J. The Emerging Knowledge Governance Approach: Challenges and Characteristics. Volume 14(1): 29–52 ISSN 1350–5084 , 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508407071859
Foss, N.J.,Minbaeva , D.B., Pedersen, T.. Reinholt,M. ENCOURAGING KNOWLEDGE SHARING AMONG EMPLOYEES: HOW JOB DESIGN MATTERS.Human Resource Management, November–December 2009, Vol. 48, No. 6, Pp. 871– 893, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20320
Hankonen,N., Stenius,M., Ravaja, N., Haukkala, A. "Why share expertise? A closer look at the qualityof motivation to share or withhold knowledge", Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 20 Issue: 2, pp.181-198, 2016https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2015-0124T. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2015-0124
Hansen M.T., Nohria N., Tierny T., “What’s your Strategy for managing Knowledge?”, in Harvard Business Review, n.77(2), 1999, pagg. 106-116.
Herbst, A.S."Capturing knowledge from lessons learned at the work package level in project engineeringteams", Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 21 Issue: 4, pp.765-778, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-07-2016-0273
Harker, P. T. Incomplete pairwise comparissons in the analytic hierarchy process, Mathl Modelling, v. 9, n. 11, p. 837 – 848, 1987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90503-3
Jakobus, D., Rensburg, J.V., Pretorius, L. Managing for volatility on technology projects: A conceptual model. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 110 ( 2014 ) 40 – 51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.846
Jamal, A., Khedhaouria, A. " Sourcing knowledge for innovation: knowledge reuse and creation in project teams", Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 19 Issue: 5, pp.932-948, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-01-2015-0039
J.P Gilly; M. Kechidi and D.Talbot. Resilience of organisations and territories: The role of pivot firms European Management Journal. Volume 32, Issue 4, August 2014, Pages 596-602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2013.09.004
Kamla, A.B.Knowledge workers’ perceptions of potentialbenefits and challenges of inter-organizationalknowledge sharing systems: a Delphi study inthe health sector.Knowledge Management Research & Practice (2013), 1–11.
Knudsen,M.P., Madsen, E.S. "The managerial issues related to transferring shop floorknowledge in manufacturing relocation", International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol.34 Issue: 11, pp.1389-1416, doi: 10.1108/IJOPM-01-2013-0044, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-01-2013-0044
Kumar, S.; Singh, V.; Haleem, A. “Knowledge management-enablers and barriers: a questionnaire-based study.”Int. J. Knowledge Engineering and Data Mining, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKEDM.2014.066233
Kwiesielewicz, M.; Van Uden, E. Ranking Decision Variants by Subjective Paired Comparisons in Cases with Incomplete Data LNCS, v. 2667, Springer, Heidelberg, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44842-X_22
Lee, A.V; Vargo, J.; and Seville, E.“Developing a Tool to Measure and Compare Organizations’ Resilience”.Nat. Hazards Rev. 2013.14:29-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000075
Li, J.,Li-Ying, J., Ning, L.,Yuan, L."Knowledge sharing and affective commitment: the mediating role of psychological ownership", Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 19 Issue: 6, pp.1146-1166, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-01-2015-0043
Linda J. Bellamy, Monique Chambon , Viola van Guldener, (2018) "Getting resilience into safety programs using simple tools - a research background and practical implementation". Reliability Engineering and System Safety 172 (2018) 171–184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.12.005
Malik, P., Garg, P.The relationship between learning culture, inquiry and dialogue, knowledge sharing structure and affectivecommitment to change(2017) Journal of Organizational Change Management, 30 (4), pp. 610-631. Cited 10 times.DOI: 10.1108/JOCM-09-2016-0176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-09-2016-0176
Muniz, J.; Batista Jr, E.D.; Loureiro, G."Knowledge‐based integrated production management model", Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 14 Issue: 6, pp.858-871, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271011084907 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271011084907
Nakano, D. N., Muniz Jr., J., & Batista Jr., E. D. (2013), Engaging Environments: Tacit Knowledge sharing on the shop floor. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17, 290-306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271311315222
Nonaka, I.; Takeuchi, H. Criação do Conhecimento na Empresa: como as empresas geram a dinâmica da inovação. Rio de Janeiro: Campus,1997.
Paulin, D and Suneson, K. “Knowledge Transfer, Knowledge Sharing and KnowledgeBarriers – Three Blurry Terms in KM” The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management Volume 10 Issue 1
(pp81-91), 2012 available online at www.ejkm.com.
Peng, H. "Why and when do people hide knowledge?", Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 17 Iss 3 pp. 398 - 415), 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-12-2012-0380
Petrini, S. O. Análise do Fatores para o Compartilhamento do Conhecimento Operário em Indústrias do setor Automotivo no Brasil. 2015. 86 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia Mecânica) – Faculdade de Engenharia do Campus de Guaratinguetá, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Guaratinguetá, 2015.
Pratt, A.C. City, Culture and Society 6 (2015) 61e67 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2014.11.001
Riccardo Patriarca, Johan Bergström, Giulio Di Gravio, Francesco Costantino. Resilience engineering: Current status of the research and future challenges Safety Science 102 (2018) 79–100 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.10.005
Rosso, C.B., Saurin, T.A.The joint use of resilience engineering and lean production for work system design: A study in healthcare Applied Ergonomics 71 (2018) 45–56 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.04.004
Saaty, T. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980.. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21236/ADA214804
Sawalha, I.H.S."Managing adversity: understanding some dimensions of organizational resilience", Management Research Review, Vol. 38 Issue: 4, pp.346-366.
Seville, E."Resilience:Great concept … but what does it mean?" Compete Briefing Bite – Paper Presented at the US Council on CompetitivenessWorkshop, Risk and Resilience. Wilmington, USA. November 2008.
Shiraishi, S., Obata, T., Daigo, M. Properties of a positive reciprocal matrix and their application to AHP, Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan, v. 41, n. 3, p. 404 – 414, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15807/jorsj.41.404
TARHAN, C., AYDIN, C., TECIM, V.How can be disaster resilience built with using sustainable development? CigdemTarhan et al. / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 216 ( 2016 ) 452 – 459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.12.059
Sawalha, I. H. S. "Managing adversity: understanding some dimensions oforganizational resilience", Management Research Review, Vol. 38 Issue: 4, pp.346-366, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-01-2014-0010
VAN DEN HOOFF, B.; DE RIDDER, J. A. Knowledge sharing in context: The influence of commitment, communication climate and CMC use on knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, v. 8, n. 6, p.117-130, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270410567675
Wang, S.; A. Noe, Raymond. “Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research.”Human Resource Management Review 20 (2010) 115–131.
Wong, W.L.P., Racliffe, D.F. The Tacit Nature of Design Knowledge. Technology Analysis and StrategicManagement. 12(4): 493- 512, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/713698497
Simon, M. L.; Antonio Pamplona Salomon, Valério; Muniz, J. Jr. COMPLEXITY INFLUENCE ON CONSORTUIM MODULAR OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE, Fapesp, 2013.
Sheng Wang. Raymond A. Noe. Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research.Human Resource Management Review 20 (2010) 115–131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.10.001
Stephenson , A., Seville , E., Vargo , J., Roger, D. Benchmark Resilience - A study of the resilience of organisations in the Auckland Region. Resilient Organisations .Research Report 2010/03b, available in www.resorgs.org.nz, 2010.
FeryalAslani, Mohammad Mousakhani, Alireza Aslani. Knowledge Sharing: A Survey, Assessment and Directions for Future Research: Individual Behavior Perspective.World Academy of Science, Engineering and TechnologyInternational Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering Vol:6, No:8, 2012.
RaziehDehghani, Raman Ramsin, (2015) "Methodologies for developing knowledge management systems: an evaluation framework", Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 19 Issue: 4, pp.682-710, https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2014-0438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2014-0438
Werner Rutten, Joyce Blaas-Franken, Harry Martin, (2016) "The impact of (low) trust on knowledge sharing", Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 20 Issue: 2, pp.199-214, https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2015-0391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2015-0391
Rivard, S., Vieru,D. The Resilience of Pre-Merger Fields of Practice during Post-Merger Information Systems Development.International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction,14(3), 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/IJTHI.2018070104
Sharma, S.K., Tamanna. Relationship between knowledge management and organizational resilience in northern healthcare sector(2019) International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8 (12), pp. 3099-3105.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
O(s) autor(es) do artigo autorizam a publicação do texto na revista e garantem que a contribuição é original e inédita, não estando em processo de avaliação em outra(s) revista(s). As opiniões, ideias e conceitos emitidos nos textos são de inteira responsabilidade do(s) autor(es), não sendo a revista responsável por tais conteúdos.
Os editores da revista reservam o direito de efetuar ajustes textuais e de adequação às normas da publicação, caso necessário.
Os autores mantêm os direitos autorais sobre o trabalho e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, sendo o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0), o que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
Os autores têm autorização para firmar contratos adicionais, separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.