Barriers to Corporate Social Responsibility: the perceptions of a leading non-governmental organization

Diego Valerio de Godoy Delmonico, Hugo Henrique dos Santos, Octaviano Rojas Luiz, João Victor Rojas Luiz, Bárbara Stolte Bezerra, Rosane Aparecida Gomes Battistelle

Resumo


Purpose – This study aims to identify the main barriers to develop Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) from the viewpoint of a leading Non-governmental Organization (NGO). The proposed methodology evaluates the importance attached to different classes of barriers to CSR from the privileged perspective of a Brazilian NGO.

Theoretical framework – This study was based on the current theory of barriers to CSR initiatives and multicriteria decision making.

Design/methodology/approach – The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method was used to assess and prioritize barriers to CSR through expert opinion. The ranking of stability was tested through a sensitivity analysis of the assigned weights.

Findings  The results indicate that the main barrier is a lack of commitment of senior management. By contrast, the least determining barriers were a lack of social auditing, diversity, and customer awareness.

Originality/value – The article contributes by extending the application of multiple-criteria decision-making methods to CSR and evaluating the relative importance of the barriers. This study also offers empirical results that broaden the discussion on barriers to social responsibility, guiding managers and decision makers who lead CSR initiatives in organizations to understand which barriers should be overcome, and where managers should focus their effects to do so. 

Keywords - Analytic hierarchy process; Multicriteria decision making; CSR; Non-governmental organizations; Sustainable development.


Palavras-chave


analytic hierarchy process; multicriteria decision making; CSR; non-governmental organizations; sustainable development.

Texto completo:

PDF (English)

Referências


AGUDO-VALIENTE, J.; GARCÉS-AYERBE, C.; SALVADOR-FIGUERAS, M. Corporate Social Responsibility Drivers and Barriers According to Managers’ Perception; Evidence from Spanish Firms. Sustainability, v. 9, n. 12, p. 1821, 11 out. 2017.

ALBAREDA, L.; LOZANO, J. M.; YSA, T. Public Policies on Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Governments in Europe. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 74, n. 4, p. 391–407, 14 ago. 2007.

AREVALO, J. A.; ARAVIND, D. Corporate social responsibility practices in India: approach, drivers, and barriers. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, v. 11, n. 4, p. 399–414, 2011.

ARIAS, A. O. An interpretive systemic appraisal of corporate social responsibility and learning. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, v. 25, n. 3, p. 361–370, 7 ago. 2008.

BASKARAN, V.; NACHIAPPAN, S.; RAHMAN, S. Supplier assessment based on corporate social responsibility criteria in Indian automotive and textile industry sectors. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, v. 4, n. 4, p. 359–369, dez. 2011.

BATTAGLIA, M. et al. An innovative model to promote CSR among SMEs operating in industrial clusters: evidence from an EU project. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, v. 17, n. 3, p. 133–141, 17 mar. 2010.

BISWAS, U. A.; GARG, S.; SINGH, A. Integrating analytic hierarchy process in corporate social responsibility measurement. International Journal of Operational Research, v. 29, n. 3, p. 317, 2017.

BOWEN, H. R. Social responsibility of the businessman. New York: Harper & Row, 1953.

CAMPIN, S.; BARRAKET, J.; LUKE, B. micro-Business Community Responsibility in Australia: Approaches, Motivations and Barriers. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 115, n. 3, p. 489–513, 3 jul. 2013.

CAMPION, E. D. The career adaptive refugee: Exploring the structural and personal barriers to refugee resettlement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, v. 105, p. 6–16, abr. 2018.

CARROLL, A. B. Corporate Social Responsibility. Business & Society, v. 38, n. 3, p. 268–295, 26 set. 1999.

CHANG, C.-W. et al. An application of AHP and sensitivity analysis for selecting the best slicing machine. Computers & Industrial Engineering, v. 52, n. 2, p. 296–307, mar. 2007.

DA SILVA WEGNER, R. et al. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in the analysis of marketing mix in a construction material company. Revista Gestão da Produção Operações e Sistemas, v. 13, n. 2, p. 299–320, 1 jun. 2018.

DAHLSRUD, A. How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, v. 15, n. 1, p. 1–13, jan. 2008.

DE BAKKER, F. G. A.; GROENEWEGEN, P.; DEN HOND, F. A Bibliometric Analysis of 30 Years of Research and Theory on Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Social Performance. Business & Society, v. 44, n. 3, p. 283–317, 2005.

DELMONICO, D. V. DE G. et al. Waste management barriers in developing country hospitals: Case study and AHP analysis. Waste Management & Research, v. 36, n. 1, p. 48–58, 20 jan. 2018.

DEN HOND, F. et al. Playing on Two Chessboards: Reputation Effects between Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Corporate Political Activity (CPA). Journal of Management Studies, v. 51, n. 5, p. 790–813, 2014.

DETIENNE, K. B.; LEWIS, L. W. The Pragmatic and Ethical Barriers to Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: The Nike Case. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 60, n. 4, p. 359–376, set. 2005.

DEUS, R. M. DE; SELES, B. M. R. P.; VIEIRA, K. R. O. Organizations and ISO 26000: Review of concepts, motivators, and barriers to implementation. Gestão & Produção, v. 21, n. 4, p. 793–809, 7 nov. 2014.

DIXON-O’MARA, C.; RYAN, L. Energy efficiency in the food retail sector: barriers, drivers and acceptable policies. Energy Efficiency, v. 11, n. 2, p. 445–464, 24 fev. 2018.

DOH, J. P.; GUAY, T. R. Corporate Social Responsibility, Public Policy, and NGO Activism in Europe and the United States: An Institutional-Stakeholder Perspective. Journal of Management Studies, v. 43, n. 1, p. 47–73, jan. 2006.

DOS SANTOS, H. H.; MÁXIMO DE SOUZA, R.; SOUZA ARAGÃO, A. Decision analysis in referrals of children and adolescent victims of violence: An ANP approach. Journal of the Operational Research Society, v. 69, n. 9, p. 1483–1492, 2 set. 2018.

DUARTE, F.; RAHMAN, S. Perceptions of corporate social responsibility by Bangladeshi managers: an exploratory study. International Review of Business Research Papers, v. 6, n. 5, p. 119–136, 2010.

EGRI, C. P.; RALSTON, D. A. Corporate responsibility: A review of international management research from 1998 to 2007. Journal of International Management, v. 14, n. 4, p. 319–339, dez. 2008.

FAISAL, M. N. Analysing the barriers to corporate social responsibility in supply chains: an interpretive structural modelling approach. International Journal of Logistics-Research and Applications, v. 13, n. 3, p. 179–195, 2010.

GARAVAN, T. N. et al. Conceptualizing the behavioral barriers to CSR and CS in organizations: A typology of HRD interventions. Advances in Developing Human Resources, v. 12, n. 5, p. 587–613, 2010.

GORDON, M. et al. Divergent stakeholder views of corporate social responsibility in the Australian forest plantation sector. Journal of Environmental Management, v. 113, p. 390–398, dez. 2012.

GOVINDAN, K. et al. Barriers analysis for green supply chain management implementation in Indian industries using analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 147, p. 555–568, jan. 2014.

GOYAL, P.; KUMAR, D. Modeling the CSR barriers in manufacturing industries. Benchmarking: An International Journal, v. 24, n. 7, p. 1871–1890, 2 out. 2017.

GRIESSE, M. A. The Geographic, Political, and Economic Context for Corporate Social Responsibility in Brazil. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 73, n. 1, p. 21–37, 1 maio 2007.

HEALD, M. Management’s Responsibility to Society: The Growth of an Idea. Business History Review, v. 31, n. 4, p. 375–384, 24 dez. 1957.

HILSON, A.; HILSON, G.; DAUDA, S. Corporate Social Responsibility at African mines: Linking the past to the present. Journal of Environmental Management, v. 241, p. 340–352, jul. 2019.

HO, W. Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications – A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, v. 186, n. 1, p. 211–228, abr. 2008.

HOLME, R.; WATTS, P. Corporate Social Responsibility: Making Good Business Sense. [s.l.] World Business Council for Sustainable Development, 2000.

ISHIZAKA, A.; LABIB, A. Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process. Expert Systems with Applications, v. 38, n. 11, p. 14336–14345, maio 2011.

ISHIZAKA, A.; SIRAJ, S. Are multi-criteria decision-making tools useful? An experimental comparative study of three methods. European Journal of Operational Research, v. 264, n. 2, p. 462–471, jan. 2018.

JABBOUR, C. J. C. et al. “There is no carnival without samba”: Revealing barriers hampering biodiversity-based R&D and eco-design in Brazil. Journal of Environmental Management, v. 206, p. 236–245, 2018.

JAUERNIG, J.; UHL, M.; LUETGE, C. Voluntary agreements between competitors: trick or truth? Journal of Business Economics, v. 87, n. 9, p. 1173–1191, 3 dez. 2017.

JUVAN, E.; DOLNICAR, S. Can tourists easily choose a low carbon footprint vacation? Journal of Sustainable Tourism, v. 22, n. 2, p. 175–194, 17 fev. 2014.

KANGAS, H.-L.; LAZAREVIC, D.; KIVIMAA, P. Technical skills, disinterest and non-functional regulation: Barriers to building energy efficiency in Finland viewed by energy service companies. Energy Policy, v. 114, n. October 2016, p. 63–76, mar. 2018.

KARASSIN, O.; BAR-HAIM, A. Multilevel corporate environmental responsibility. Journal of Environmental Management, v. 183, p. 110–120, dez. 2016.

KOSTKA, G.; MOSLENER, U.; ANDREAS, J. Barriers to increasing energy efficiency: evidence from small-and medium-sized enterprises in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 57, p. 59–68, out. 2013.

KUO, T. C. et al. Motivations and barriers for corporate social responsibility reporting: Evidence from the airline industry. Journal of Air Transport Management, v. 57, p. 184–195, out. 2016.

LAPIŅA, I.; MAURĀNE, G.; STARIŅECA, O. Human Resource Management Models: Aspects of Knowledge Management and Corporate Social Responsibility. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, v. 110, p. 577–586, jan. 2014.

LAUDAL, T. Drivers and barriers of CSR and the size and internationalization of firms. Social Responsibility Journal, v. 7, n. 2, p. 234–256, 7 jun. 2011.

LAUESEN, L. M. CSR in publicly owned enterprises: opportunities and barriers. Social Responsibility Journal, v. 7, n. 4, p. 558–577, 4 out. 2011.

MILBRATH, L. W. Psychological, Cultural, and Informational Barriers to Sustainability. Journal of Social Issues, v. 51, n. 4, p. 101–120, jan. 1995.

NWOKE, U. Corporations and development. International Journal of Law and Management, v. 59, n. 1, p. 122–146, 13 fev. 2017.

PEÑA, A. M. Rising Powers, Rising Networks: Brazilian Actors in Private Governance. Oxford Development Studies, v. 42, n. 2, p. 217–237, 3 abr. 2014.

PETRENKO, O. V. et al. Corporate social responsibility or CEO narcissism? CSR motivations and organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal, v. 37, n. 2, p. 262–279, fev. 2016.

RAI, V.; BECK, A. L. Play and learn: Serious games in breaking informational barriers in residential solar energy adoption in the United States. Energy Research & Social Science, v. 27, p. 70–77, maio 2017.

RAUCH, J. E.; CASELLA, A. Overcoming Informational Barriers to International Resource Allocation: Prices and Ties*. The Economic Journal, v. 113, n. 484, p. 21–42, jan. 2003.

REIMER, M.; VAN DOORN, S.; HEYDEN, M. L. M. Unpacking Functional Experience Complementarities in Senior Leaders’ Influences on CSR Strategy: A CEO–Top Management Team Approach. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 151, n. 4, p. 977–995, 16 set. 2018.

SAATY, T. L. How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, v. 48, n. 1, p. 9–26, set. 1990.

SHEN, L.; GOVINDAN, K.; SHANKAR, M. Evaluation of Barriers of Corporate Social Responsibility Using an Analytical Hierarchy Process under a Fuzzy Environment—A Textile Case. Sustainability, v. 7, n. 3, p. 3493–3514, 23 mar. 2015.

SIPAHI, S.; TIMOR, M. The analytic hierarchy process and analytic network process: an overview of applications. Management Decision, v. 48, n. 5, p. 775–808, jun. 2010.

SWEENEY, L. Corporate social responsibility in Ireland: barriers and opportunities experienced by SMEs when undertaking CSR. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, v. 7, n. 4, p. 516–523, 14 ago. 2007.

TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL. Corruption Perceptions Index 2018. Berlin: [s.n.].

UN GLOBAL COMPACT. Our Participants. Disponível em: .

VALMOHAMMADI, C. Investigating corporate social responsibility practices in Iranian organizations: an ISO 26000 perspective. Business Strategy Series, v. 12, n. 5, p. 257–263, 6 set. 2011.

WATTS, P.; HOLME, R. Corporate Social Responsibility: Meeting Changing Expectations. [s.l.] World Business Council for Sustainable Development, 1999.

YUEN, K. F.; LIM, J. M. Barriers to the Implementation of Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility in Shipping. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, v. 32, n. 1, p. 49–57, mar. 2016.

ZIENTARA, P. Socioemotional Wealth and Corporate Social Responsibility: A Critical Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 144, n. 1, p. 185–199, 5 ago. 2017.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15675/gepros.v15i4.2706

Apontamentos

  • Não há apontamentos.




Licença Creative Commons

Está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons - Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional

e-ISSN: 1984-2430
GEPROS. Gest. prod. oper. sist., Bauru, São Paulo-SP (Brasil).

Departamento de Engenharia de Produção da Faculdade de Engenharia da UNESP - Bauru

Av. Eng. Edmundo Carrijo Coube, n° 14-01 Fone: 55-14-3103-6122