Business Model Canvas and Strategic Model Canvas: contributions to refresh the way managers strategize
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15675/gepros.v17i4.2907Keywords:
Business Model Canvas, Strategic Model Canvas, Strategy-as-practiceAbstract
Objective: The purpose of this paper is examining the application experiences on the use of the Business Model Canvas and the Strategic Model Canvas, in order to know whether both tools can renew the managers’ ways of strategizing.
Originality/value: Our paper brings contributions to the strategy-as-practice paradigm by suggesting new practices and combinations between strategy ‘soft’ tools and analytical tools.
Design/methodology/approach: Using an action research method, we have followed the strategy process of four Brazilian companies.
Results: We have shown empirical evidences that the combined use of the Business Model Canvas and the Strategic Model Canvas has helped managers to understand and solve strategic problems in a way that other traditional strategy tools haven’t.
Keywords – Business Model Canvas; Strategic Model Canvas; Strategy-as-practice.
References
ABRAHAM, S. Will business model innovation replace strategic analysis? Strategy & Leadership, v. 41, n. 2, p. 31–38, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/10878571311318222
AFUAH, A. Business models: A strategic management approach. New York, McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2004.
AMIT, R.; ZOTT, C. Value creation in e-business. Strategic management journal, v. 22, n. 6–7, p. 493–520, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.187
ANTONI, C. Management by objectives–an effective tool for teamwork? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, v. 16, n. 2, p. 174–184, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0958519042000311381
AVDIJI, H. et al. A design theory for visual inquiry tools. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, v. 21, n. 3, p. 3, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00617
AZEVEDO, P. H. D. DE A. M. DE et al. Strategic Model Canvas: Uma Proposta de Ferramenta para Otimizar o Planejamento Estratégico. Revista de Gestão e Projetos, v. 9, n. 3, 28 dez. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5585/gep.v9i3.11262
BADEN-FULLER, C.; MANGEMATIN, V. Business models: A challenging agenda. Strategic Organization, v. 11, n. 4, p. 418–427, nov. 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127013510112
BOONS, F.; LÜDEKE-FREUND, F. Business models for sustainable innovation: state-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner production, v. 45, p. 9–19, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.007
BRATSBERG, H. M. Empathy maps of the FourSight preferences. 2012.
BRAUN, M.; LATHAM, S.; CANNATELLI, B. Strategy and business models: why winning companies need both. Journal of Business Strategy, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-01-2019-0005
CASADESUS-MASANELL, R.; RICART, J. E. From Strategy to Business Models and to Tactics. p. 45, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2010.01.004
CHESBROUGH, H. Business model innovation: it’s not just about technology anymore. Strategy & leadership, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/10878570710833714
CHESBROUGH, H. Business model innovation: opportunities and barriers. Long range planning, v. 43, n. 2–3, p. 354–363, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.010
DOGANOVA, L.; EYQUEM-RENAULT, M. What do business models do?: Innovation devices in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, v. 38, n. 10, p. 1559–1570, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.08.002
EPPLER, M. J.; PLATTS, K. W. Visual strategizing: the systematic use of visualization in the strategic-planning process. Long Range Planning, v. 42, n. 1, p. 42–74, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2008.11.005
GEBHARD, J. G. Awareness of teaching through action research: Examples, benefits, limitations. JALT Journal, v. 27, n. 1, p. 53–69, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37546/JALTJJ27.1-3
HAGEL III, J.; SINGER, M. Unbundling the corporation. Harvard business review, v. 77, n. 2, p. 133–134, 1999.
HELFAT, C. E.; PETERAF, M. A. The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic management journal, v. 24, n. 10, p. 997–1010, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.332
HILL, T.; WESTBROOK, R. SWOT Analysis: It’s Time for a Product Recall, long range planning, 30 (1): 46-52 https://doi. org/10.1016. S0024-6301 (96), p. 00095–7, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(96)00095-7
HUFF, A. S. Mapping strategic thought. Hoboken, New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons, 1990.
JARRATT, D.; STILES, D. How are methodologies and tools framing managers’ strategizing practice in competitive strategy development? British journal of management, v. 21, n. 1, p. 28–43, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00665.x
JARZABKOWSKI, P.; KAPLAN, S. Strategy tools-in-use: A framework for understanding “technologies of rationality” in practice. Strategic management journal, v. 36, n. 4, p. 537–558, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2270
JOHNSON, G. Managing strategic change—strategy, culture and action. Long range planning, v. 25, n. 1, p. 28–36, 1992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(92)90307-N
KAPLAN, R. S.; NORTON, D. P. Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Brighton, Massachusetts, Harvard business review Press, 1996.
KIM, W. C.; MAUBORGNE, R. Blue ocean strategy, expanded edition: How to create uncontested market space and make the competition irrelevant. Brighton, Massachusetts, Harvard business review Press, 2014.
KIMBELL, L. Rethinking design thinking: Part I. Design and Culture, v. 3, n. 3, p. 285–306, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2752/175470811X13071166525216
KNIGHT, E.; DAYMOND, J.; PAROUTIS, S. Design-Led Strategy: How To Bring Design Thinking Into The Art Of Strategic Management. California Management Review, p. 0008125619897594, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619897594
KNOTT, P. Strategy tools: who really uses them? Journal of Business Strategy, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02756660810902297
LINDER, J. Changing business models: Surveying the landscape. 2001. Accenture Institute for Strategic Change.
MAGRETTA, J. Why business models matter. Boston, Massachusetts, Harvard Business School Boston, MA, 2002.
MAGRETTA, J. Understanding Michael Porter: The essential guide to competition and strategy. Boston, Massachusetts, Harvard business press, 2011.
MARCH, J. G. Rationality, foolishness, and adaptive intelligence. Strategic management journal, v. 27, n. 3, p. 201–214, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.515
MASSA, L.; TUCCI, C. L.; AFUAH, A. A critical assessment of business model research. Academy of Management Annals, v. 11, n. 1, p. 73–104, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2014.0072
MAURYA, A. Running lean: iterate from plan A to a plan that works. Sebastopol, California, O’Reilly Media, Inc., 2012.
MINTZBERG, H. The design school: reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management. Strategic management journal, v. 11, n. 3, p. 171–195, 1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250110302
NUNTAMANOP, P.; KAURANEN, I.; IGEL, B. A new model of strategic thinking competency. Journal of Strategy and Management, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-10-2012-0052
O’BRIEN, F. Supporting the strategy process: A survey of UK OR/MS practitioners. Journal of the Operational Research Society, v. 62, n. 5, p. 900–920, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2011.2
OSTERWALDER, A.; PIGNEUR, Y. Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2010.
RIES, E. The lean startup: How today’s entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. New York: Crown Books, 2011.
RITTER, T.; LETTL, C. The wider implications of business-model research. Long range planning, v. 51, n. 1, p. 1–8, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.07.005
SHAFER, S. M.; SMITH, H. J.; LINDER, J. C. The power of business models. Business horizons, v. 48, n. 3, p. 199–207, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2004.10.014
SPEE, A. P.; JARZABKOWSKI, P. Strategy tools as boundary objects. London, England, SAGE Publications Sage UK: London, England, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127009102674
TEECE, D. J. Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long range planning, v. 43, n. 2–3, p. 172–194, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.003
TEECE, D. J. Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long range planning, v. 51, n. 1, p. 40–49, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.007
TIKKANEN, H. et al. Managerial cognition, action and the business model of the firm. Management decision, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740510603565
TRIMI, S.; BERBEGAL-MIRABENT, J. Business model innovation in entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, v. 8, n. 4, p. 449–465, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-012-0234-3
VAARA, E.; WHITTINGTON, R. Strategy-as-practice: Taking social practices seriously. The Academy of Management Annals, v. 6, n. 1, p. 285–336, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2012.672039
WEINER, N.; WEISBECKER, A. A business model framework for the design and evaluation of business models in the internet of services. 2011 Annual SRII Global Conference. Anais...IEEE, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/SRII.2011.13
WHITTINGTON, R. Strategy as practice. Long range planning, v. 29, n. 5, p. 731–735, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(96)00068-4
WILLIS, J. W.; EDWARDS, C. Action research: Models, methods, and examples. Charlotte, NC. IAP, 2014.
ZHENG, W.; YANG, B.; MCLEAN, G. N. Linking organizational culture, structure, strategy, and organizational effectiveness: Mediating role of knowledge management. Journal of Business research, v. 63, n. 7, p. 763–771, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.06.005
ZOTT, C.; AMIT, R.; MASSA, L. The business model: recent developments and future research. Journal of management, v. 37, n. 4, p. 1019–1042, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311406265
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
O(s) autor(es) do artigo autorizam a publicação do texto na revista e garantem que a contribuição é original e inédita, não estando em processo de avaliação em outra(s) revista(s). As opiniões, ideias e conceitos emitidos nos textos são de inteira responsabilidade do(s) autor(es), não sendo a revista responsável por tais conteúdos.
Os editores da revista reservam o direito de efetuar ajustes textuais e de adequação às normas da publicação, caso necessário.
Os autores mantêm os direitos autorais sobre o trabalho e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, sendo o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0), o que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
Os autores têm autorização para firmar contratos adicionais, separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
